Emperor’s Rants and Observations

In the past there have been critics of Palin in regards to her being a woman, being pregnant, and giving birth to her latest child Trig.  The criticism has basically been that Palin should have been home with her children, that she should have disclosed her pregnancy earlier, that she should have resigned when Trig was born to devote herself to his special needs care.  There were also some that criticized her for risking going to Texas while in the latest stages of her pregnancy putting herself and perhaps her unborn baby at risk.

In each case I argued against those critics because I don’t believe any of that has anything to do with Palin’s - or any woman’s - ability to do their job.  I believe every woman should be able to decide for themselves what is right and appropriate for themselves and their families.  I believe in equality for women.  I believe in their right to privacy.

I defended Palin in spite of her views on such issues as abortion, birth control, and sex education in public schools.

Now that it’s public knowledge that her unwed 17 year old daughter is pregnant however, I think it’s fair to question her on her “abstinence only” education stance.  If Palin can’t make that work in her own family, then what makes her believe it will work in ANY family.

However, we have to be careful in how we broach the subject because if people begin to feel as though Palin and her family are being ‘picked on unfairly’ it will most likely result in sympathy votes for the McCain/Palin ticket.   The same thing happened in the Gubernatorial campaign when opponent Andrew Halcro routinely made Palin look like a bumbling hillbilly that had no clue about the issues affecting Alaska.  Halcro lost ground, while Palin in spite of her ignorance, gained ground.

We should all sincerely wish the very best for Bristol, Levi and their baby.  They are embarking on a rough road, but if they truly love each other and work hard at the task of being a family, they can succeed and be happy.   I’m happy for them that they have a loving family that will help and support them, not all young adults in this situation are so fortunate.  They have done nothing wrong to deserve media attention, negative or otherwise.

They do however illustrate that even in the best of families, sometimes our young people don’t always  make the choices that we wish they would.  That’s why we have to give them every tool available to keep them as safe as possible. We need to provide them as many alternatives as possible when they do make a bad choice or find themselves in a difficult situation.

Another concern is the trend for Palin to only disclose or come forward with information when absolutely forced to.  She did it with her own pregnancy.  She did it all through the “Trooper Gate” (and continues to in my opinion). It begs the question of what else is she hiding? Not only that, but now what else does McCain know that hasn’t been disclosed?

There are many questions that need to be asked and answered.  I only hope that questions will be focused on issues and positions and not personal family matters.  Let’s show a little class and decency.

*Note:  I am not now, nor have I ever been, or likely ever be connected with the Obama campaign or Democratic Party.  I’m pretty sure they are happy about that fact.

Now that McCain has selected Palin as his running mate it’s important to get out the real dope on her before she becomes one heart beat away from the Oval Office.

First of all take a look at her impressive resume from when she was a candidate for Governor of Alaska.*(see note)  What should come to your attention is that she has never held a real job (outside of government).  She has always been taken care of by her parents or her husband.  She did some volunteer work and was elected mayor of a second class Alaska city.  Not much more than a bedroom community of Anchorage.  Even in that little fiefdom of hers, there were grumbling about her abuse of the office and misusing public resources for her personal gain.

So why would Alaskans elect such an obviously inexperienced, uneducated and ill-prepared candidate to be Governor you ask?  It was a perfect storm of sorts that swept her into office, she didn’t even get the support of the majority of Alaskans.

In 2006 the corruption scandal was just getting public.  It seemed like everyone (particularly Republicans) were either under investigation or under suspicion.  The incumbent Governor Frank Murkowski had the lowest approval rating of any politician in the state.  It would have been a major upset if he won the Republican primary.  The ongoing battle with Exxon over the financial settlement for the devastating oil spill in 1989 along with a lack of progress of development of Alaska’s Natural Gas resources left Alaska looking for a fresh face untainted by the Oil Companies.  The previous administration had negotiated a deal with the natural gas lease holders “behind closed doors”.  A deal that many felt gave too much to the lease holders without requiring commitments from them to build the gas line.  Those suspicions were confirmed with the conviction of Murkowski Chief of Staff Jim Clark.   So Palin ran on the platform of “open and transparent” government and ethics.  Even though throughout the campaign Palin showed a total lack of understanding of the issues, the media basically gave her a free ride.  The more other candidates challenged her, the more sympathy she received from the voters.  Anyone that was against Palin was characterized as being either in the pocket of “Big Oil” or accused of being a misogynist.  Her “shucks, golly gee whiz” persona led to the highest approval rating of any Governor in the country.  Alaskans were enamored with the small town girl who made the big time.

However there are cracks in the facade Palin presented to Alaskan voters .  She is currently under investigation by the legislature for abuse of power involving the firing of her appointed Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety.   She’s backing away from her pledge of open and transparent government by saying that the public isn’t entitled to see emails concerning public business.   She’s facing an ethics complaint from a former State employee.  She has shown poor judgment by selecting a new Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety that had been reprimanded for sexual harassment in his previous position.  He was forced to resign after two weeks in the position, but received $10,000.00 in severance pay.  She is also well known for her favoritism and cronyism.  During her campaign for Governor, Palin said to Alaskans “hold me accountable“, and yet no matter what happens in her administration she is never responsible, it’s always someone or something to blame, but never her.

Let me also dispel the myth that Palin is a fiscal conservative.  Under her administration the operating budget has grown 23%.  She gained some national press by cutting capital projects that would have put Alaskans to work on much needed community improvement.  Looking at the cuts however shows she favored her home district or used the budget to punish or reward certain districts or legislators.  While she is cutting community projects, she’s giving 500 million dollars to a Canadian firm to start a gas line to Canada but with no requirement to actually build the gas line.  A gas line that will benefit and produce more jobs and industry to Canada than to Alaskans and the remainder of the US.  Then to buy off Alaskans she appropriates an additional $1200 dollars to every Alaskan man, woman and child in addition the annual Permanent Fund Dividend.

She is however, a social conservative, which is most likely why McCain chose her.  She will appeal to the radical far right Christian fundamentalists that believe the government should have the ability to coerce individuals to treat their bodies according to their closed minded dogma.

The national media should do a much better job of exposing Palin as nothing more than a small town hockey Mom that is in way over her head.  The American people should do a better job getting past the phony “golly gee” facade Palin presents.  She’s an empty vessel that will shatter when pressed for the hard answers if the media and voters do their jobs.

*Note: The Palin for Governor site that was hosted at http://www.palinforgovernor.com/ was taken down as I was writing this post.  This is typical of Palin, the Murkowski documents regarding his gas line proposal was taken down when people started comparing her AGIA with the Murkowski proposal.  This is more of what is apparently meant by her empty promise of “open and transparent” Government.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission report to Congress said any applicant proposing to build a multibillion-dollar pipeline to carry North Slope gas to market ideally should have firm commitments from producers to ship the gas on the new pipeline.

Many predicted this exact scenario when AGIA was “debated”.

People said there would few if any qualifying offers. We got one

People said that it was going no where without commitments from producers to ship gas through the line.

People said that AGIA would only delay the process further and we would be no closer to the reality of a Gas Pipeline at the end of Palin’s term than we were at the beginning.

People warned that Palin was not going to bully the producers into making a deal that was too risky without a commitment on taxes.

Also, let’s applaud the one man in the legislature, Ralph Samuels, that had the courage of his convictions to vote against AGIA in the wake of the Veco scandal for this exact reason.

Alaskan Best Search - Ralph Samuels

AGIA was a giant step backward. It didn’t produce the competition Palin promised. And yet she steadfastly refuses to consider the proposals of Conoco-Phillips or the Alaska Gasline Port Authority.

The fact is that Palin and her underlings have been wrong every step of the way. Each passing day we are further and further away from making the pipeline a reality.

Alaskan Best Search - Alaska Gasline Port Authority
Alaskan Best Search - ConocoPhillips Gas Pipeline

Palin has committed 500 Million dollars to a company that probably won’t even qualify to get the required permits because they have no gas to ship.

Here is the Murkowski negotiated contract.

You can find all of the supporting documents here.

There is no pipeline if there is no commitment to ship gas. There is no commitment to ship gas without stable long term agreement on costs to the producers. Nobody in their right mind would commit to hundreds of billions of dollars in any project without knowing the the long term costs. Nobody is going to bully the oil companies into making that kind of investment. Even with the bribe of 500 Million dollars the state was only able to get one “qualifying” offer. That alone should be enough to convince anyone how far off Palin is in her thinking.

I can’t fathom why these simple facts are so hard for some people to grasp.

Are we, as a State and people, willing to invest the billions of dollars and take all the risk to develop our vast resources? For instance, are we willing to invest the nearly 40 billion dollars in the Permanent Fund into developing and bringing our resources to market?

There is a good deal of empty rhetoric about how the resources are “ours” and we should dictate and control how and when they are developed. However, whether it is Oil, Gas, Fish, Timber or Minerals it’s private enterprises that take the risk, make the investments and provide the labor and expertise needed. What role should the State take other than landlord, and recipient of taxes, fees and royalties?

Alaskan Best Search - “Natural Resources“

During the campaign our Good Queen P promised she would favor the Mat-Su Valley. Although it’s the only campaign promise she has kept to date, she has taken care of her Mat-Su Valley constituents, even if it is at the expense of the rest of the state.

Our first hint of her intention to follow through with her “Valley First” promise was when she replaced the Agriculture Board with all Valley residents with the exception of one token Anchorage member who just happened to be from the Valley.

Our Good Queen really out did herself with her vetoes on the 2008 Capital Budget. With the notable exception of the veto of spending from the Railbelt Energy Fund, the Mat-Su got off relatively unscathed. But more than just the obvious favoritism shown to Mat-Su Valley is the lack of any consistency.

As Andy Halcro writes in his Blog:

She vetoed $1 million for the University of Alaska to design a new sports complex saying the should pay for it themselves, while approving $3 million for a meeting hall in Fairbanks and $630,000 for a new kitchen at the Wasilla Sports complex. She vetoed $1.5 million for deferred maintenance for Anchorage public facilities because it wasn’t a state’s responsibility, while approving $3.8 million for a new kitchen for the Fairbanks North Star Borough.

I’m not complaining about the bulk of the vetoes. This isn’t me whining about my ox getting gored, I just want everyone’s ox to be gored equally. It doesn’t appear to me that the cuts were made along philosophical lines, which I would respect even if I didn’t agree. It almost seems like she targeted particular areas or legislative districts to reward or punish.

All she had to do was use the same criteria for her vetoes regardless of their region or election district. If improvements to sports facilities are not a “State Responsibility” in Anchorage, then they shouldn’t be a “State Responsibility” in Wasilla. You want to talk about “bias”? The Queen’s photo should be next to the word in the dictionary. You don’t find a better definition of the term than our Good Queen P.

How she can call herself a fiscal conservative when the Operating Budget is larger than ever is beyond me. The fact is both the operating and the capital budgets came in at a combined $350 million higher than what she promised. A far cry from the “Bare Bones Budget” she promised while campaigning.

Speaking of broken promises, what ever happened with “open and transparent” government? Why were these cuts made behind closed doors without discussion with legislators or other government leaders? Why can’t we get access to the information hidden behind this password protected page? Why is the budget information not presented in the original format of a spreadsheet? It’s nearly impossible to do any serious analysis when it’s presented in a PDF format that you can’t sort and query. Is that done on purpose, just so those of us that are interested in doing so, can’t? Take a look at the options provided for the viewing the 2007 Budget and compare that to what the options are for the 2008 Budget. Is this really what we thought we were going to get with the Queen’s open and transparent government?

As if favoritism, inconsistency, hiding and obfuscation of the data wasn’t bad enough, the worst is the lack of leadership and vision provided from the Queen’s throne. Why wasn’t she working more closely with Legislators and communicating her vision? Why wasn’t she speaking up during the legislative process to lead rather than react? Why isn’t she out front on this now explaining the favoritisim and inconsistencies? It is almost as though our Good Queen set this situation up so she would be seen as the hero of the people. Why no comment on the ballooning cost of the State’s operating budget?

She has failed to deliver on her promise of a bare bones budget. She has failed to even begin to address the operating budget. She has failed to step up and take a leadership position or provide any vision for Alaska’s future. She has failed to deliver on the promise of transparency and openness in the State Government. She has failed to treat all Alaskans equally across regions.

From where I sit it looks as Queen P was ill-prepared to take office. As I feared without any experience at the state level. It’s too bad that the people of Alaska have to suffer through her on the job training.  Perhaps the problem is that she hasn’t surrounded herself with competent people. Perhaps she is spending to much time making appearances and videos for late night TV, rather than working on the things that she was sent to do in Juneau… like being a leader, cutting the budget and making government open and transparent.